UNC Baker Lab - Vial Comparison Falls

Selecting the Correct Autosampler Vial and Insert to Improve Reproducibility and Accuracy in Mass Spectrometry Analyses
  • Instrument: 6560 Q-TOF LC/MS
  • SpikeIn: Yes
  • Keywords: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, Autosampler Vial, Long-Term Storage, Mass Spectrometry
  • Lab head: Erin Baker Submitter: James Dodds
Abstract
Acquiring accurate and reproducible data is crucial for analytical chemists, however, sample storage and manipulation play a large role in achieving high-quality results. In mass spectrometry, autosampler vials and small-volume inserts are commonly used for sample introduction to the instrument and long-term storage, however, the utility, design, and material of these vary greatly. Here, we assessed differences in data reproducibility, sample loss, and physical differences among vials and inserts made of glass and polypropylene for combinations including (vial/insert): glass/glass (GG), glass/polypropylene (GP), polypropylene/glass (PG), and polypropylene/polypropylene (PP). Six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were evaluated for 32 days to determine peak area reproducibility over time since PFAS do not degrade, therefore changes would most likely be due to adhesion and evaporation. On Day 1, the measured average peaks areas for the 6 PFAS were not statistically significant between any combinations, however, PP was the least reproducible (relative standard deviation >10%). All samples were then recapped and stored for one month at -20°C and reanalyzed to compare the peak areas between Day 1 to Day 32. All combinations showed greater than 10% differences in peak area for at least 4 PFAS and both evaporation and adhesion were observed. While the greatest effects due to adhesion occurred in the glass inserts, the glass vials showed the least volume loss to evaporation. Thus, when adhesion and evaporation are considered together, the GP combination is recommended for PFAS analyses as the glass vial reduces evaporation rates and the polypropylene insert minimizes adhesion.
Experiment Description
In this experiment, two LC-IMS-MS analyses were conducted to study isotopically-labeled PFAS in different autosampler vials with small volume inserts. The first analysis occurred on the same day as sample preparation (Pre, Day 1) and the second occurred after a month frozen in storage (Post, Day 32) to determine reproducibility of analyses over time.
Sample Description
Samples are isotopically-labeled PFAS standards diluted 33.3-fold in 40:60 methanol:water with 5 mM ammonium acetate.
Created on 4/30/25, 9:22 PM
Clustergrammer Heatmap
 
Download
Vial Comparison Post 01152025 v1 (not daily)_2025-04-29_15-52-29.sky.zip2025-04-30 21:22:231024242419
Vial Comparison Pre v2_2025-04-29_15-49-25.sky.zip2025-04-30 21:22:231024242423